Once when Rishi Gautam leaves for his morning ablutions, Indra comes in his guise and has sex with Ahalya. On his way out, he meets the sage who had sensed something was amiss and returned early. He curses Indra to have 1000 marks of what he covets the most on his body, and as the woman who couldn’t distinguish the touch of her husband was no better than a stone, curses Ahalya to turn into a stone herself. The gods intervened and the 1000 marks are converted into eyes, sahasra-aksha, and Ahalya would be redeemed when Vishnu visited her as Lord Rama. Ahalya is never asked to give her side of the story, nor does she make any effort to explain. She maintains a stony silence.
Ahalya is created by Lord Brahma out of water as the most beautiful woman in order to break the pride of Urvashi, the foremost celestial nymph. Then Brahma places her in the care of Rishi Gautam until she reaches puberty. When the sage returns Ahalya, Brahma, impressed by the sage’s sexual restraint and asceticism, bestows her upon the sage himself. Lord Indra, believing that all beautiful things on earth are meant for him, resents Ahalya’s marriage to the forest-dwelling ascetic.
Where did Ahalya fit in? Didn’t the Supreme Creator find it necessary to ask her if she wanted a husband who had been a father figure? Scriptures say that man has duties and responsibilities at every stage of his life. Man has a responsibility towards his wife during the householder stage and it’s his duty to keep his wife and family happy. If that was so, was Ahalya happy? Could a man for whom the act of sex was nothing but a ritual, satisfy the cravings of a youthful maiden? At the prime of her youth, she had to live with an old man whose attention was elsewhere.
Some say Ahalya wasn’t to be blamed, as she didn’t know about Indra’s disguise. Did she really not know that the man in front of her wasn’t her husband? Or should the question be, was she guilty at all?
As Brahma’s daughter, it was highly improbable that she didn’t see through Indra’s deception. Ahalya knew her husband’s daily routine and for him to crave bodily pleasure at the brahma-muhurta when the union of a man and woman is forbidden was out of character, and a woman who had spent a lifetime with a person ought to have known that. Scriptures say that gods have not form but a heavenly aroma, which should have been the other indicator that this wasn’t her husband. But she doesn’t question and gives in. In the early cantos of the Ramayana, Valmiki says:possessed by sensual passion Ahalya has surrendered herself to Indra consciously.
The story of Tara and Chandra: If a dissatisfied partner has an affair, who is to be blamed?
Did the Supreme Creator take pains in creating this beauty to let her wither in the dry desert of an ascetic’s ashram?
When the owner of the flower neglected its bloom, wasn’t it obvious that bees would swoon over this beautiful flower? And in such a state of momentary adulation, if the flower did allow the bee to have its nectar, was this unnatural?
Wasn’t the sage’s curse for Ahalya to become a stone ironic in itself?
She, who was known as Ahalya since birth, became unploughable only after the curse! She was cursed to be barren and lifeless like a stone only after she felt the most fertile in her life. She was made inert only after she felt like a woman for the first and probably the only time. How was the inertness different after the curse, since prior to that she was no different from a living stone? How had her life changed, except that she didn’t have to breathe and due to the lack of feeling, she didn’t have to undergo the trauma of a neglectful husband who was confining her in the moral clutches of a lifeless matrimony? A pain that could only be felt by someone bearing the burden of divine beauty, who had the blood of youth running in her veins and who was aware that she deserved pleasures designed by the selfsame Creator!
Ahalya was punished by a man because she exercised her individuality. Her decision to yield to sexual curiosity was seen as an assertion of her femininity, a threat to the patriarchal double standards where the co-offender male gets away with a minor punishment and the woman is punished for eons.
My question to my readers: Was Ahalya’s act an act of transgression or was it a case of an individual transcendence?
NB: My book Shakuntala – The Woman Wronged has debated this topic from different angles.Published in